|
Download
full survey report (80 pages, 1.6M)

"Conflict
between beekeepers and honey badgers Mellivora capensis,
with
reference to their conservation status and distribution in South
Africa" |
Summary
Until
recently the honey badger (Mellivora capensis), a “red data”
species, has remained one of South Africa’s least studied carnivores.
Their conservation status and distribution have remained largely unknown
due to their solitary and secretive nature. Hence, the recent escalation
of honey badger damage to apiaries resulting in their heavy persecution
over the past decade by beekeepers, is of grave concern to
conservationists.
This
report sets out to document the significance of the conflict both from the
point of view of the beekeeping industry and honey badger conservation.
During
the course of the study 82 beekeepers were interviewed regarding this
conflict. This included 50 beekeepers maintaining more than 24 000 hives
in the Western Cape. Of the Western Cape beekeeper sample, 82%
acknowledged that they experienced problems with badgers and 50% of these
beekeepers admitted to killing badgers at some time, although all were
aware of the legal protection afforded to this vulnerable species. While
78% of the beekeepers had undertaken some form of hive protection, 22%
continued to kill badgers and other non-target species. These badgers were
killed despite the high annual costs involved and the availability of cost
effective, long-term solutions.
Conventional
domestic beehives can be, and have been, cost effectively protected from
honey badger depredation for decades. Simple procedures for protecting
hives are discussed and recommendations made for their wider use within
both beekeeping and farming communities. In some cases beekeepers that had
protected their hives actually expressed satisfaction that badgers were
visiting their apiaries, but were unable to cause any damage. On occasions
when a beehive was damaged, the beekeeper took responsibility and
acknowledged that the job had not been well done, or that a hive was in
particularly poor condition. Often the less commercially successful
beekeepers simply refused to accept that their colleagues had found viable
and most importantly cheaper alternatives to killing badgers. Fortunately
many beekeepers have made commendable efforts to protect their beehives
and it is hoped that peer pressure from within the beekeeping industry
will influence those members that continue to kill badgers.
The report suggests that
official pressure should also be placed on the beekeeping industry to
utilize environmentally responsible practices and all apiaries should be
adequately protected when situated proximal to habitats conducive to the
support of honey badgers. Only 30% of National Parks and 28% of the
Western Cape’s Provincial Nature Reserves may currently support viable
populations of honey badgers. In the central region of South Africa the
species appears to exist in very low numbers. Consequently, the population
of badgers that currently exists in the coastal lowlands of the Western
Cape is a vitally important refuge for this species in South Africa.
Nature conservation authorities
need to be made aware of the significance of the honey badger / beekeeper
conflict. Due to the large areas required to sustain viable honey badger
populations, it is essential that beekeepers in the communities
surrounding protected areas be informed of protective measures and that
their apiaries are randomly checked. Unfortunately,
as long as gin traps are readily available in retail outlets their
incorrect and inhumane use will continue.
It
is concluded that beekeepers are a significant threat to the conservation
of honey badgers (particularly in the Western Cape) and badgers are being
needlessly persecuted in a most inhumane way.
Introduction
a)
Motivation
Following
requests for information on honey badgers published in local magazines
(Begg & Begg 2000 a, b, c & e), two independent reports were
received of badgers being killed by beekeepers in the Western Cape. It was
reported that, despite their legal protection, between one to two hundred
badgers were being killed each year by South African beekeepers. Nature
conservation authorities were contacted in this regard but, in the most
part, were unaware of the conflict or its extent.
A
few beekeepers voiced the opinion that preventing honey badgers from
raiding beehives was not economically viable and that they were so common
in the Western Cape’s coastal lowlands that the area could be considered
overpopulated. They maintained that badgers should be declared a problem
animal and in extreme cases, beekeepers should be compensated for the
damage they caused. Some beekeepers claimed to be losing more than R100
000 in damage annually, directly attributable to honey badgers. Conversely, many reserve managers and conservationists
regarded the badger as “rare” and their presence was seldom recorded
in the very same areas where beekeepers are experiencing serious problems.
Not surprisingly, reserve managers asked how an animal that appeared to be
so rare could be causing such a major problem for beekeepers?
In
1985 reports from two Beekeeping Associations whose members were
experiencing problems with badgers prompted the Mammal Research Institute
(Skinner, 1985) to initiate a project aimed at addressing some of the very
same issues dealt with in the current report. Unfortunately, after
publishing a request for information in the South African Bee Journal,
nothing came of this early initiative and the few responses received were
based on hearsay (Skinner
pers. comm.).
In
addition to raiding apiaries, honey badgers are also widely blamed for
depredations on small domestic stock (Smithers 1986),
are killed for traditional medicine and for use as protective charms or as
charms for hunting dogs (Cunningham & Zondi 1991). Their pelts are
sometimes sold to taxidermists (pers. obs.) and appear for sale in
traditional markets in Swaziland and Zimbabwe (Monadjem 1998 and pers. obs.).
It is commonly
thought that there have been population declines with local extinctions in
areas where badgers are persecuted (Comrie-Grieg 1985). Smithers (1983)
states that honey badgers are “relentlessly destroyed in the Northern
Cape Province by the use of gin traps, hunting by various means and the
laying of poisonous baits”.
At
present honey badgers are officially listed as “vulnerable” (i.e. the
species may become endangered if the casual factors for their decline
continue) in the South African Red Data book (Smithers 1986) and they
appear on Appendix III of the CITES agreement (Schouter 1992). In the Cape
provinces badgers are a schedule 2 protected wild animal (Anon 1974) but
they are essentially unprotected outside of game reserves and national
parks in other provinces (Rowe-Rowe 1992). They are thought to be absent
from large portions of the North West, Free State, Gauteng, Mpumalanga,
southern Kwazulu Natal and areas of the northern and eastern Cape
provinces (Rowe-Rowe 1992; Skinner & Smithers 1990; Smithers 1986;
Rautenbach 1982; Coetzee 1977; Pringle 1977).
In
December 1999 a three and a half year field study of honey badgers was
completed in the Kalahari Gemsbok National Park (Begg et. al in
prep.). This study provided the first detailed knowledge of badger
behaviour in the wild and results suggested that honey badgers might be
particularly vulnerable to high levels of persecution. Honey
badgers utilised unusually large areas and due to their small litter size
and long time to independence, had a slow recruitment rate into the
population. The small size of
many of South Africa’s protected areas suggest that they may be
inadequate in conserving viable populations if neighbouring areas do not
co-operate with their conservation.
The
goal of this study was to assess the significance of the conflict between
honey badgers and beekeepers in South Africa and to investigate the
historic and current distribution and conservation status of this species.
The
objectives of this survey were to:
|